|
By Kyle Prast
Monday, Nov 17 2008, 11:03 AM
Do you ever get the feeling that those who believe in Global Warming don't want to be confused by the facts? I fully support a person's right to believe what they please. That doesn't mean their beliefs are correct, but they do have the right to believe what they want. We call that free will. But when their beliefs start infringing on my rights, limit my choices, raise food and energy prices, and cripple our economy, then I draw the line. Yet that is exactly what is happening in our government and President Elect Obama is marching lock step to the global warming drummer. If you were paying attention, October was a chilly month around the world. Yet the Global Warming devotees stated otherwise. The UK Telegraph gave a startling explanation in The world has never seen such freezing heat: (My emphasis)
A
surreal scientific blunder last week raised a huge question mark about
the temperature records that underpin the worldwide alarm over global
warming. On Monday, Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS),
which is run by Al Gore's chief scientific ally, Dr James Hansen, and
is one of four bodies responsible for monitoring global temperatures,
announced that last month was the hottest October on record.This was startling. Across the world there were reports of unseasonal snow and
plummeting temperatures last month, from the American Great Plains to
China, and from the Alps to New Zealand. China's official news agency
reported that Tibet had suffered its "worst snowstorm ever". In the US,
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local
snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and
ranked it as only the 70th-warmest October in 114 years. How do you explain that discrepancy? GISS says last October was "the hottest October on record", yet NOAA reported 63 record snowfalls and 115 lowest temps, and we observe much the same. Plus, aren't scientists supposed to observe and question? If the data says one thing, but world wide weather reports of early snows show something else, wouldn't that make you look closer at the data? Thankfully, some did.
... when expert readers of the two leading
warming-skeptic blogs, Watts Up With That and Climate Audit,
began detailed analysis of the GISS data they made an astonishing
discovery. The reason for the freak figures was that scores of
temperature records from Russia and elsewhere were not based on October
readings at all. Figures from the previous month had simply been
carried over and repeated two months running.
The
error was so glaring that when it was reported on the two blogs - run
by the US meteorologist Anthony Watts and Steve McIntyre, the Canadian
computer analyst who won fame for his expert debunking of the notorious
"hockey stick" graph - GISS began hastily revising its figures. This
only made the confusion worse because, to compensate for the lowered
temperatures in Russia, GISS claimed to have discovered a new "hotspot"
in the Arctic - in a month when satellite images were showing Arctic
sea-ice recovering so fast from its summer melt that three weeks ago it
was 30 per cent more extensive than at the same time last year.
The
GISS admitted that some data was "obtained from another body" and they didn't "have resources to exercise proper quality control" over that data! Amazing. The GISS figures are used by the UN "to promote its case for global warming." They use GISS because "they consistently show higher
temperatures than the others."
Yet last week's latest
episode is far from the first time Dr Hansen's methodology has been
called in question. In 2007 he was forced by Mr Watts and Mr McIntyre
to revise his published figures for US surface temperatures, to show
that the hottest decade of the 20th century was not the 1990s, as he
had claimed, but the 1930s.
More and more data shows that brief period of warming in the 1990s has ended, yet Al Gore, the media, and some in government stubbornly hold to their religion of Global Warming.
[Is it] wise for the world's governments to
embark on some of the most costly economic measures ever proposed, to
remedy a problem which may actually not exist, is a question which
should give us all pause for thought. Candidate Obama said he would look at off shore drilling and clean coal. President Elect Obama retreats to his earlier positions of bankrupting our coal fired power plants through Cap and Trade and reinstating the moratorium on offshore oil drilling. These two measures will further cripple an ailing US economy. And why? Because of a stubborn belief in the bad science of Global Warming. What would Cap and Trade mean to us? America's Climate Security act "Catastrophic for Wisconsin" and Cap-and-Trade? Maybe it should be called Cap-and-Raid!
Across the pond, they have the same problem, Climate Change Bill makes chilling reading:
Declining global temperatures continue to make a
mockery of those computer model projections on which the whole global
warming scare is based.
As I have asked before, has there ever in history been such a collective flight from reality?
Film-makers taking on our 'global warming hysteria': A new Irish film claims that climate change guru Al Gore is an
alarmist and that those who think they are saving the planet are only
hurting the poor. IF THE ADVANCE publicity is anything to go by,
Not Evil Just Wrong will do for Al Gore what Michael Moore's Fahrenheit
9/11 did for George W Bush.
Please, comment content should relate to the subject of the post. Although I try to respond to many, do not interpret my lack of a response as agreement.
Links:
Brookfield7, Fairly Conservative, Vicki Mckenna, Jay Weber, The Right View Wisconsin, Mark Levin, CNS News
|
By Kyle Prast
Wednesday, Nov 12 2008, 04:56 PM
A picture is worth a 1,000 words. Click this National Climatic Data Center/ NOAA link to see a map United States. It shows U.S. temperature averages from January through October of this year. The cruel joke is, now that temperatures are colder again, energy prices* are higher because of environmental protection measures! Another cruel joke: "State $5 billion in the red -- Governor to go to Beverly Hills"** by Rep. Jim Ott: On the same day Governor Doyle announced that Wisconsin has a budget
deficit in excess of $5 billion, the largest in state history, and
talked about spending cuts, tax hikes and job cuts, he announced that
he is flying to California next week for a summit on Global Warming.
The summit will be held at the Beverly Hills Hilton. ...
“Wisconsinites are facing the worst fiscal crisis in the state’s
history and Governor Doyle is flying to Beverly Hills, CA “…to develop
creative, collective actions to advance the global climate
agreement….”that hasn’t even been negotiated yet???” asked
Representative Jim Ott.
Rep. Ott added this point, “Furthermore how does firing up your state plane – you don’t exactly
have a history of flying commercial - reduce your carbon foot print?
The least you could do is fly Midwest Express, support a Wisconsin
company, and use some of the airline miles you must have accumulated on
your September global warming trip to Germany.”
Remember that Representative Jim Ott is also a Meteorologist--he knows his weather statistics! Colder temperatures? State $5 billion in the hole? No matter, Gov. Doyle has his priorities. Too bad they aren't mine. *We can't drill for new oil or natural gas sources, we can't build coal fired electricity plants, we can't build nuclear power plants, and we are forced to use expensive solar and wind, all because of environmental extremists. **I heard this on Mark Belling's show today. Please, comment content should relate to the subject of the post. Although I try to respond to many, do not interpret my lack of a response as agreement.
Links:
Brookfield7, Fairly Conservative, Vicki Mckenna, Jay Weber, The Right View Wisconsin, Mark Levin, CNS News
|
By Kyle Prast
Thursday, Oct 30 2008, 09:36 AM
The world must not have gotten Al Gore's memo that the earth is warming. Yesterday Record cold swept over the region Wednesday in Ocala, Florida. (My emphasis throughout)
Twice the temperature dipped to freezing at the Ocala International
Airport early Wednesday before it began making a gradual climb to the
mid-60s. Though there was a reading of freezing or below throughout northwest
Marion County, Wednesday morning's official low temperature was 33
degrees. It was a record for Oct. 29 and the second lowest
temperature ever recorded in October since 1850...
...In almost every area of the county at daybreak Wednesday, frost - which came six weeks early - glistened on grass and rooftops.
On the other side of the pond, the Gore Effect has gone into full swing even without Mr. Gore's presence. Just discussing Global Warming legislation prompted the earliest snowfall in 86 years: Snow blankets London for Global Warming debate, How Parliament passed the Climate Bill:
Snow fell as the House of Commons debated Global Warming yesterday -
the first October fall in the metropolis since 1922. The Mother of
Parliaments was discussing the Mother of All Bills for the last time,
in a marathon six hour session.
In order to combat a projected two degree centigrade rise in global
temperature, the Climate Change Bill pledges the UK to reduce its
carbon dioxide emissions by 80 per cent by 2050. The bill was receiving
a third reading, which means both the last chance for both democratic
scrutiny and consent. The bill creates an enormous bureaucratic apparatus for monitoring
and reporting, which was expanded at the last minute...
Recently the American media has begun to notice the odd incongruity
of saturation media coverage here which insists that global warming is
both man-made and urgent, and a British public which increasingly
doubts either to be true. 60 per cent of the British population now
doubt the influence of humans on climate change, and more people than
not think Global Warming won't be as bad "as people say".
Both figures are higher than a year ago - and the poll was taken before the non-summer of 2008, and the (latest) credit crisis.
No need to worry about American jobs being outsourced to the UK after that bill! Will our congress follow suit? Blindly following Al Gore, our Pied Piper of Global Warming, marching down the road through early freezes and snow storms to Carbon Capping economic ruin? Guess it depends on who is in charge: The Triumvirate of Obama, Pelosi, and Reid or McCain balancing that Democrat controlled Congress?
Please, comment content should relate to the subject of the post. Although I try to respond to many, do not interpret my lack of a response as agreement.
Links:
Brookfield7, Fairly Conservative, Vicki Mckenna, Jay Weber, The Right View Wisconsin, Mark Levin, CNS News
|
By Kyle Prast
Saturday, Oct 25 2008, 04:13 PM
I found this interesting blog, The Reference Frame, on the Drudge Report. It's
written by Lobos Motl, a Czech physicist.
Seems Al Gore is having a tougher time speaking out about the dangers of Global
Warming. Frequently, unusually cold weather accompanies him on his speaking
engagements. This must happen fairly often because there is even a term for it,
The Gore effect:
The phenomenon that leads to unseasonably cold temperatures, driving rain, hail,
or snow whenever Al Gore visits an area to discuss global warming. Hence, the
Gore Effect.
Well, Al Gore spoke at Harvard yesterday. Guess what? The temperature
plummeted. (My emphasis) Gore effect arrives to Harvard University:
It seems to be working again: see Weather
Underground (no, it is not the leftist militant group that may have
inspired Barack Obama: the name of the weather service is just a good joke).
In Cambridge,
the warmest October 22nd occurred in 1979 when the temperature climbed to 83
°F. Well, it doesn't look like what they see today. Even the average high
temperature for this day is 60 °F which is still far too high. After the
noon, the temperature in Cambridge
is 44.5 °F. Tonight, it is predicted to drop to 34 °F, close to the record
low of 28 °F measured in 1940.
For tomorrow night, the temperature in Cambridge
is forecast to drop below the freezing point to 28 °F which, if true, will beat
the record low temperature set in 1883, which means exactly 125 years ago...
Does the reality of colder temperatures have any effect on Harvard's
sustainability goals or Gore's message? No. Here is the email from the Office
of Harvard's President:
Although today's weather will hardly remind us of the serious problem that
is global warming, today's event - the Harvard Sustainability Celebration, with
a keynote address by former Vice President Al Gore - will go on...
Starting at 3 p.m., we will be serving hot cider and soup to keep
everyone warm; please dress for our changeable New England
weather. Henry Longfellow, onetime Harvard professor and longtime
Cantabrigian, once remarked, "The best thing one can do when it's raining
is to let it rain." We sincerely hope that, this afternoon, it won't rain.
But even if it does, Harvard celebrates Sustainability with spirits undampened.
I loved the physicist's observation about that email:
Cute! The best thing one can do when it's raining is to let it rain but
the best thing one can do when it's warming by 0.6 °C per century is to fight
the climate, to redesign the Harvard logo, to unravel the modern
industrial civilization (if you allow me to exaggerate just a little bit), and
to serve people hot soup and cider so that they won't freeze during the
celebration of their heroic fight against warming. ;-)
I know the term Global Warming is morphing to Climate Change,
just because one just cannot depend on the weather to cooperate when scaring
people into believing we need to drastically cut CO2 emissions. Al Gore's
credibility and livelihood rests on selling the idea of reducing CO2 and selling carbon credits.
Wednesday, our high temperature was supposed to be 53 degrees. When you
compare that to the average
October temps chart for our zip code, we are 6 degrees below average
for the 22nd. I heard the word "snow flurries" in the Sunday weather forecast. Take a look at that chart--especially at the years we hit record
highs: 18 of the 31 record highs were set before 1970, 4 highs were set in the
1990s, and 2 in 2003. Pretty unusual for a planet that is heating as much as
ours supposedly is.
No doubt about it; we did have a warming phase. (I will never forget the summer of 1995. Temps were often above 100 and we had no air conditioning!) But that trend to warmer
temperatures seems to be heading back down. Those who are invested in Green
ideology and technology, like Al Gore, will not let it go easily...whether or
not, weather permitting.
Please, comment content should relate to the subject of the post. Although I try to respond to many, do not interpret my lack of a response as agreement.
Links:
Brookfield7, Fairly Conservative, Betterbrookfield, Jay Weber, Mark Levin, Vicki Mckenna
|
By Kyle Prast
Wednesday, Sep 3 2008, 12:43 PM
Have you noticed that this summer was cooler than usual? That fact, coupled with our recent cold and snowy winter, takes the subject of Global Warming off the front burner.
The last time the temperature didn't hit 90 degrees in Milwaukee
during a summer* was in 2000, the weather service said. Before that, it
was 1915.
But without even knowing what the daily highs were, could you tell our days and nights were cooler when compared to other summers? I could. Thanks to lower evening temperatures, we were able to avoid turning on our electricity guzzling air conditioner this summer.
As a gardener, I know this summer has been cooler. Tomatoes, which require warm evening temperatures, are ripening slowly. This spring my peach trees let me know we had a colder than usual winter by producing only 2 blossoms. Essentially all of the flowering buds were frozen out. I haven't had a bumper crop in years. We may have had a stretch of warmer than usual temperatures in recent years. These fueled the Global Warming argument. Who could forget the summer of 1995? (We were remodeling. The whole east side of our house was open to the elements and mosquitoes. Couldn't run the air.) Remember that summer? We had a number of 100+ days! It was awful.
But the warming trend seems to have turned around, and I think it is taking the wind out of the Global Warming alarmists' sails. Did you notice how the Global Warming/Climate Change issue was no longer in the limelight at the Democrat convention? There was lots of talk about energy independence and getting off of foreign oil from the Democrats, but not much on reducing carbon footprints, or Global Warming specifically, that I heard. Barack Obama did not mention Global Warming or even Climate Change in his speech. The closest Obama came
to it was, (my emphasis)
And for the sake of our economy, our security, and the future of our
planet, I will set a clear goal as President: in ten years, we will
finally end our dependence on oil from the Middle East...
...As
President, I will tap our natural gas reserves, invest in clean coal
technology, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power**... ...And I'll invest 150 billion
dollars over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy
- wind power and solar power and the next generation of biofuels; an
investment that will lead to new industries and five million new jobs
that pay well and can't ever be outsourced. Al Gore referred to it as climate crisis in his convention speech. But
Gore was not on the prime time coverage I viewed. He is still gung-ho on reducing dependence on big oil and coal, but even Gore did not refer to the term Global Warming--except in reference to McCain backing away from "mandatory caps on global warming pollution" legislation. The Republicans are off to a slow start with their convention due to hurricane Gustav. Last night Joe Lieberman did mention global warming briefly: If John McCain was just another go-along partisan politician, he never
would have led the fight to fix our broken immigration system or to do
something about global warming. I will be listening tonight and tomorrow to the speeches--especially for specific mention or even a hint of Global Warming or Climate Change. I think the whole issue has cooled off in light of the large temperature drop this year and the majority of Americans wanting us to drill domestically. McCain's choosing Sarah Palin from an oil producing state leads me to believe we won't be hearing much about it. *The article stated that for record keeping purposes, they count summer as being June, July, and August instead of the June 22 - Sept. 22 definition of summer. **Pretty ironic. The Democrats have been blocking these energy sources in Congress, but now that the American public is demanding domestic drilling, natural gas, clean coal, and nuclear is OK?
Links:
Brookfield7, Fairly Conservative, Betterbrookfield, Mark Levin, Vicki Mckenna
|
By Kyle Prast
Wednesday, Jun 25 2008, 07:08 PM
Gravel piles, backhoes, trucks, sewer suckers, barricades, sewer pipes and huge concrete junction pipes again are familiar sights for those living on Robinwood Street. Seems like the city just did sewer work over there.
Actually, it has been 7 years since the last sewer project. But what is going on now?
I asked Tom Grisa, the Director of Public Works. He said it is a sanitary sewer project.
While it may seem that the project started because of the June 7th rains, it has been in the works for over a year. From Tom Grisa:
"The City replaced a portion of the sanitary sewer on Robinwood from S[outh]. 123rd St. to Parkmoor in accordance with the engineering report and storm water and flood task force recommendations for this area. This work was done in 2001. Since then we have had several sewer backups on Robinwood west of Parkmoor, so we decided to replace the sewer from Parkmoor to Harvey with the expectation that this should help the situation.
"This has been in the works for a little over a year. We proposed the improvement in last year's budget and Capital plan, designed it over the winter, got approval from regulatory agencies this spring and bid the work out and awarded it in late May.
"This improvement will help reduce the frequency and severity of basement backups..."
Many residents living on the side streets near Robinwood experienced basement flooding and sewer backups again. Grisa explained: 
"...this rain resulted in many homes with flooded basements from their
sump pumps not keeping up for a variety of reasons (pump failed, pump
burned out because they pumped against a lot of pressure from a full
storm sewer or ditch, pump couldn't keep up, power outage, window wells
leaked, walls leaked, floors leaked through cracks, downspouts were not
extended or knocked off, etc.) When that happens all that water goes
down the floor drain into our sewer which is then overloaded and backs
up into other people's houses."
Since I've lived in Brookfield, we have had two 100 year rains and now a Millennium rain or flood, depending on your circumstance. When we moved here in 1986, we had no idea that we chose a home on very high ground, just a few houses east of the subcontinental divide on Sunnyslope. Once those 100 year rains came, we realized how blessed we were. The residents near Robinwood Street, less than 1 mile east of us however, are not that fortunate. The land is low over there.
According to residents who predate Brookfield becoming a city, much of Robinwood Street was a wetland, complete with ducks. (The old-timers also say that the Pick 'n Save on Greenfield in West Allis was a marsh when they moved in.)
Kinsey Park pond used to have a dam near Elm Grove Road. If full enough, the pond water would spill over the dam and run down the open storm sewer. As a kid, my cousins, sister and I explored that storm sewer all the way down Robinwood--a very stupid thing to do. Hey, we were kids, we did not know that if it would have rained, we would have been killed. (My parents and aunt and uncle sure did not know what we were up to.)
The City of Brookfield took out the dam--I'm trying to remember--in the 1990s? They installed an overflow stand pipe type drain with a baffle inside and a grate on the top. The baffle acts like an internal dam. Children can no longer access the storm sewers like we so foolishly did. Trouble is, when we have a severe rain like the June 7th storm, fallen trees from Kinsey woods wash down the creek and plug the drain. Photo is from June 8th. The backhoe was removing some of the debris. I spoke with a motorist who saw the pond the evening of June 7th. They said the pond had overflowed its banks and the southbound lane of Elm Grove Road was flooded. A workman was trying to remove debris from the grate that night, so the pond could properly drain. (If you look closely, the drain is on the far left of the photo.) Back in the 1940s and 1950s, most of this area was farmland, and Cardinal Crest subdivision along Robinwood wasn't developed yet. When we had heavy rains, it really did not matter. But now the southeast corner of Brookfield is nearly totally developed. When it rains; it matters! Engineering continues to make improvements. Judging by the amount of soggy items out on the driveways waiting to be picked up, even though this last rain was heavier than our previous 2 deluges, it seemed fewer homes were affected. I sincerely hope this project improves the situation for these Robinwood area residents. Have anything to add to my history of the area? I love to hear from long time residents.
Click here to sign the DRILL HERE. DRILL NOW. PAY LESS. domestic drilling petition and see the latest links to related oil news (updated every day). Drill Here is now over the 1 million mark. The goal is 3 million signatures by the Democratic and Republican Conventions. Links:
Brookfield7, Fairly Conservative, Betterbrookfield, Mark Levin , Vicki Mckenna
|
By Kyle Prast
Sunday, Jun 8 2008, 02:55 PM
We're not out of the woods yet with the storms and flooding. As I am writing this at 2pm, it feels and looks like it could let lose again. Some areas in Brookfield experienced serious flooding yesterday. I noticed today the creek next to Pilgrim Road across from Wirth Park had roaring white caps! Some places were still under water today too: Pilgrim Road was closed by Pilgrim Park Middle School. If it rains heavily again today, there will be more. (Monday road closure update)
I saw this back-ho at Kinsey Park Pond just before 2pm today. Yesterday at around 7:30pm the pond was up over the banks and completely flooding Elm Grove Road. I think this was due to the debris washed down from the woods creek and possibly blocking the pond outlet drain?
Please be aware that the road conditions and area flooding do cause problems besides wet basements.
DO NOT drive through deep water. It can cause serious damage to your vehicle--even blow your engine! Most cars today have their air intakes quite low. My son checked mine and found the air intake in the lower part of the front bumper. (No making waves for me!) Even less than 1 foot of water can cause serious damage. Gone are the days when the carburetor and air intake sat on top of the engine. If your car stalls out going through deep water, often you are better off to NOT try to start it. In fact today we need to go look at someone's car that stalled out trying to traverse just 9" or so of water yesterday. It sure did not seem that deep at the time.
I am no mechanic of course, but water sucked into an engine causes serious damage. I think my son called the condition hydro-locked.
Tom Grisa sent around an email to the aldermen about flooding--his own neighborhood was flooded! Here are a few excerpts:
Obviously we have had a torrential downpour in Brookfield. We are doing the best we can to deal with the myriad of problems caused by this massive storm. Flooding exists in numerous locations.
According to our rain gauges at the plant we had 5.8 inches of rain from 4:30 pm to midnight. That is a higher rate of rain than occurred in the 1998 flood (8 inches of rain in 12 hours). Roads are closed in many areas, streets underwater, creeks over their banks, yards flooded, basement flooded, sump pumps not able to keep up, flooded basements draining down the floor drain into the sanitary sewer causing basement backups elsewhere, etc.
Our treatment plant normally handles 7 million gallons per day (MGD). Our treatment plant is designed to treat a maximum of 50 MGD. Last night we peaked at 66 MGD. That is 50% higher than we have ever had
before since the plant was upgraded in 1996-1999 (previous record 44 MGD). I don't know how it compares to the 1998 flows. Our Riverview interceptor (along the Fox River) normally operates at 2 MGD and was flowing at 28 MGD for a time.
We have placed bypass pumps out in several locations, and some have reduced the backups, but others are still pumping.
Power outages also were prevalent in many areas resulting in sump pumps not working and floor drains taking the flow into the sanitary sewer -thus the backups.
We have had crews out yesterday afternoon and throughout the night. We ran out of barricades for closing roads per the Policeman I spoke with this morning. Crews continue to work today to alleviate things as best
they can. There just isn't much we can do with the incredible amount of rain we had. But they are doing what they can. There is just no where for the water to go.
We continue to pump sanitary sewers, clean off inlets, etc. Inlets near my house this morning at 5 am were completely covered with mulch from people's gardens and from the Lamplighter Park. That obviously prevents
the area from draining. I waded into the water a bit (only where I knew it was safe) and cleared some of the inlets and the big one for the pond. But I do not advocate anyone from wading into water as it can be extremely dangerous. If you have a basement backup emergency, please contact the treatment plant 782-0199, or if it is street flooding or overland flooding call highway at 782-5029.
Links:
Brookfield7, Fairly Conservative, Betterbrookfield, Mark Levin , Vicki Mckenna
|
More Posts
|
|