BrookfieldNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Practically Speaking

Kyle and her husband moved to Brookfield in 1986. She became active in local politics and started blogging in 2004. Her focus is primarily on local issues but often includes state and national topics, too. Kyle looks at things from the taxpayers’ perspective in a creative, yet down to earth way, addressing them from a practical point of view.

Dr. King in town, look at candidate's content of character

By Kyle Prast
Wednesday, Mar 5 2008, 09:53 AM

I heard Dr. Alveda King speak yesterday on Vicki McKenna's radio program. Alveda is following in her uncle Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s footsteps in speaking out for civil rights for all. But the issue near and dear to her heart is one that her uncle could not even imagine--civil rights for the unborn.

Dr. King will be the keynote speaker for the Pregnancy Help Center fund raising Gala this Thursday, March 6, at Brookfield Suites. Contact Julie Caltreaux: 414-687-1691

Her mission is to make people aware that you cannot help the Dream survive while murdering children. She then gave the statistics on Planned Parenthood's genocide against Black babies. I had heard Vicki McKenna speak about this before, so  it caught my attention.

Vicki asked Alveda if she was going to vote for Barack Obama for President. Alveda stated she voted for Huckabee in the primary. (Huckabee is the most pro-life candidate.)

Dr. King then added if you are automatically voting Barack just because he is Black, go back and read King's I Have a Dream speech. His (Dr. Martin Luther King Jr's) Community is not based on color of his skin but the contend of his character.

Vicki brought up how Sen. Obama used his Christian faith to defend his position on abortion and mentioned that while in the Illinois Senate, he wouldn't even vote for basic comfort care for babies that survive botched abortions. (If you are unfamiliar, read the post and excerpts below.)

The Elephant in the Room: Obama: A harsh ideologue hidden by a feel-good image:

That bill was the Born Alive Infants Protection Act...  Who would oppose a bill that said you couldn't kill a baby who was born? Not Kennedy, Boxer or Hillary Rodham Clinton. Not even the hard-core National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL). Obama, however, is another story. The year after the Born Alive Infants Protection Act became federal law in 2002, identical language was considered in a committee of the Illinois Senate. It was defeated with the committee's chairman, Obama, leading the opposition.

Let's be clear about what Obama did, once in 2003 and twice before that. He effectively voted for infanticide. He voted to allow doctors to deny medically appropriate treatment or, worse yet, actively kill a completely delivered living baby. Infanticide - I wonder if he'll add this to the list of changes in his next victory speech and if the crowd will roar: "Yes, we can."

Alveda also mentioned Barack's Sermon on the Mount speech, where Barack stated that Jesus approved of same sex marriage. "What flawed reasoning" she said. I see some flaws in his content, she added.

Obama: Sermon on Mount OKs Same-Sex Unions:

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) told a crowd at Hocking College in Nelsonville, Ohio, Sunday that he believes the Sermon on the Mount justifies his support for legal recognition of same-sex unions. He also told the crowd that his position in favor of legalized abortion does not make him "less Christian."

"I don't think it [a same-sex union] should be called marriage, but I think that it is a legal right that they should have that is recognized by the state," said Obama. "If people find that controversial then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount, which I think is, in my mind, for my faith, more central than an obscure passage in Romans." ... St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans condemns homosexual acts as unnatural and sinful. (Hardly obscure, Romans 1: 25-28 is specific, plus the Bible teaches that all scripture is inspired.)

Dr. Alveda King is the perfect person to address these issues. She continues the great message of what America should be all about: We should judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin.

I hope people will look into the "content of their character" in their own lives as well as in their candidates.
counter hit xanga

 

Links: Betterbrookfield Vicki Mckenna 

.

One reader sent me this link: Obama and Infanticide

The technical often precedes the ethical. For me, the lines of what is legal get very blurry when you look at another side of the issue.  Now I Lay Me Down To Sleep, Portraits of Love

Comments

Larry Knetzger   

Hi Kyle, Democrats will do what ever is necessary to get into office once again to get the POWER back. Obama of course has no credibility. His morality is nonexistent. The use of religion for his run for the Whitehouse reminds me of other individuals,even in our midst here in the Milwaukee area that use religion to cover there flawed business model. "A Christian Based Company" he will just say you are misinterpreting what was said or the document from which you are reading was typed wrong, or sorry I answered all the questions I can for now, I am out of here. His last news conference where the press finally put him to the wall ended that way, behind schedule, got to go, I answered 8 questions already. Slippery as all democrats are. I am just waiting for Finegold and Kohl to have there picture taken with him. Birds of a feather flock together. Dr. King expresses her self very well with good documentation.

Kyle's reply: Republicans are not immune to promising all in a campaign either. I am not familiar with all you mentioned, Larry, but I do think Dr. King expresses herself very well.

March 5, 2008 11:19 AM

contrarian   

This is a non-story.  Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton are both Pro-Choice.

For a variety of reasons, the Pro-life movement has been unable to pass a right to life constitutional amendment, so they have moved to a two-pronged strategy of trying to place judges sympathetic to a pro-life stance, or write legistlation, mostly at the state level, that works at stopping abortion from the edges, creating circumstances where patients or providers may be placed in legal jepardy.  Resisting this has been the motivation for voting against such provisions by Pro life politicians.

The accusation of black genocide doesn't hold water.  Non-whites do get more abortions than whites by percentage, but much of that is based on class.  Women list inability to complete pregnancy or care for baby on economic grounds as a reason for abortion, so more poor people get abortions, and more minorities are poor.  More importantly, Obama, like most Democrats, is pro-choice, not pro-abortion.  Obama and both Clintons have stated that abortion should be legal and rare (abortion is not a wise method of birth control), and in fact abortion rates are dropping in this country.  In the final analysis, however, it is the black mother that chooses to terminate her pregnancy, not Obama or any other politician. By the way, 47% of women terminating a pregnancy are protestant, 27% are Catholic.  Attempts to pigeon-hole users of abortion services are dicey at best.  There is no logic to injecting a racial overtone to this discussion.  (Stats from Guttmacher.org)

If a pro-life stance is a make-or-break issue for you, there is not much here, you were not going to vote Democratic in any circumstance.  In the last few decades, we have elected both Pro-Choice and Pro-Life presidents. Barack Obama is consistently Pro-Choice.  End of story.
 

Kyle's reply: Contrarian, you would try the patience of Job. 

March 5, 2008 3:37 PM

This week’s Waukesha Carnival « Musings of a Thoughtful Conservative   

Pingback from  This week’s Waukesha Carnival « Musings of a Thoughtful Conservative

March 10, 2008 12:19 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Tags

How the other half lives

Search the Blogs