BrookfieldNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Brookfield Basics

A column about history, culture, policy, and things in between.

Animal Farm - 2007

By Tom Gehl
Monday, Oct 8 2007, 05:38 PM

In 1945 George Orwell published his classic novel Animal Farm, an allegorical and scathing look into the philosophical heart of socialism.  The smartest animals on the farm were the pigs, and by the end of his book they were walking upright on their hind legs, in order to imitate the humans.

I was reminded of this vivid imagery when I read an article about the work of a genetic research scientist.  Read carefully the words of Craig Venter:

“We are going from reading our genetic code to the ability to write it.  I am creating artificial life.  This is a very important philosophical step in the history of our species”.

I don’t understand the science of what they are undertaking, but in lay terms as I best as I can fathom the article, Venter and his team are transplanting the DNA of a cell into the bacterial cell of a different organism.  That new cell then assumes the life-form of the gene code that has been transplanted into it.  In essence, a new specie is created. 

Mr. Venter further says that he is “100% confident that the same technique would work for the artificially created chromosome.  We are dealing in big ideas.  We are trying to create a new value system for life”.

 

 “WE ARE TRYING TO CREATE A NEW VALUE SYSTEM FOR LIFE”.

 

As Dorothy might have said, “Toto – we are not in Kansas anymore”.  

It wasn’t so long ago we learned that science could create existing species in a test tube.  Now it could be close to the creation of entire species that don’t currently exist.  We cannot possibly foresee the long term implications of this, and in taking such steps without thinking them through to their conclusion, we let some very large genies out of the bottle.  And there will be no putting them back.  

We are living very fast here in the 21st Century.  Our technological capabilities are moving faster than our willingness to grapple with their implications.  I am no Luddite, and I am not opposed to progress or exploration.  Science has and can continue to help us tremendously.  But I believe it is appropriate for our political and social institutions to debate these matters before such capabilities are merely unleashed upon an entire world by a small handful of people.      

Such unprecedented discoveries will rewrite our “social DNA”.  They call for vigorous consideration in many areas, not the least of which are social, anthropological, moral, and yes, spiritual dimensions.

This is much bigger than just the science of it all.

Comments

mick   

Tom, you're a little esoteric for this crowd. Are you just indulging your personal fantasies? Or possibly you're checking to see if anyone is out there.

October 8, 2007 7:48 PM

southoftheborder   

Once things can be done, they will be done. There is no stopping these things even if society debates them and tries to stop them. I guess debating them can make people feel like they are in on the decision making but in reality it will all move forward regardless of what conclusion the debaters agree upon.

October 8, 2007 11:44 PM

heatherj   

I am having a little trouble understanding the context of this article.  Is the researcher talking about genetic engineering in general and being overly boastful, or is he talking about a whole new technique?  

I have a degree in microbiology, so I know a little about this subject.  I have done many experiments involving genetic manipulations.  Genetic engineering is nothing new, whether it is as simple as cross-breeding to types of roses to get a new hybrid or as complex as engineering corn to be resistant to pests.  To this point, no one has ever created a "new" gene.  We can only take what currently exists in nature and put it in an organism that didn't have it before.  That organism will express the properties of the new gene, but it is not a new species.  (This is how insulin of human origin is manufactured.)

At first glance, this article sounds very disturbing to me, but in re-reading this blog in order to get my thoughts organized to reply, I'm not so sure.  From what I can glean from the comments of the researcher, he may just be expressing a "God complex" that comes from belonging to the cult of evolution.

October 9, 2007 8:36 AM

Cheri M.   

God complexes and cults are not on my list of good things.

Esoteric?  As in, understood by or meant for only the select few who have special knowledge or interest? recondite?  I'll agree this article sent me a-researching!  Or shall I say, a-googling. Which is not a bad thing.  They say you learn something new every day.  I may be set for a week!  :o)

I looked up www.k-1.com/.../animf.html, and books.google.com/books,

and www.online-literature.com/.../1984  

I looked up http://www.jcvi.org/, and en.wikipedia.org/.../Craig_Venter, and www.edge.org/.../venter.html

While discussion may not be able to turn the tide on the use of leading edge technology, we as a society could adopt the attitude that just because something can be done, does not mean that it should be done.

Forewarned is forearmed.

October 9, 2007 1:58 PM

heatherj   

www.guardian.co.uk/.../genetics.climatechange

I don't know if the above is a link or if you would need to cut and paste, but I believe this is the article being discussed.

Long story short... I believe this is all hype and nothing to worry about.  If you want to read some science-babble... keep reading.

Well, it seems to me that Mr. Venter does indeed have a God Complex.  This is more disturbing than I initially thought.  This guy is a menace to science.  He sounds like he is trying to take an unnecessarily complex approach to something that is already common practice, while overstating it to make himself sound more grandiose to the lay person.

I said before that using genetic engineering to create designer bugs is nothing new, as is the case with making human insulin to treat diabetics.  Usually this is done by isolating the gene of interest from an organism that currently does the desired process (in this case, make insulin) and put it into E. coli (yes, the same bug that makes people sick).  The E. coli make insulin in super large batches that is then isolated and purified for human use.  This is done to make all sorts of chemicals, antibiotics, pest resistant crops, oil spill cleaning bugs, etc.  Basically, everything that Mr. Ventner is suggesting can already be done in a bioethically acceptable way.  

His way is much more complex.  He is knocking out much of Mycoplasma's genome and then chemically reconstructing what is left and replacing it into a Mycoplasma.  Yes, it is technically artificial, but it is not novel.  He isn't making something out of thin air.  Next, he was talking about making a new species by putting Mycoplasma into another bug.  This is ovestating it quite a bit.  Mycoplasma is a type of bacteria that infects other single cells, from bacteria to human tissue culture.  It is a big pain in the a** in the lab.  Mr. Venter saying he is making a new species is like saying I have become a new species by getting a cold virus.  Finally, the sheer complexity of it (along with the $$$ he seems to think he could make) makes me think that either this won't work at all or will be unfeasible for researchers to use.

October 9, 2007 4:21 PM

intewedm   

I got the movie Animal Farm from Netflix and watched it.  Orwell was certainly right on with this one!  It portrays exactly what happened in every country that adopted socialism and stuck with it.  What most people fail to recognize is that the so-called communist countries are actually socialist.  Communism has never actually been practiced and remains just a theory that would first require the failed socialist system to work...and that my friends will never happen!

October 15, 2007 10:22 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.

Search the Blogs